Порівняння Оновлено

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 vs Falken Azenis FK510 — порівняння

Relative Score (0–100): 60% професійних тестів, 40% відгуків власників.

Firehawk Indy 500 впевнено попереду, 82–76

Вкажіть свій розмір для точного пошуку
/R

Обидва посилання на Amazon шукатимуть саме цей розмір.

TireWheelGuide може отримувати комісію за покупки за цими посиланнями.

Шина AFirestone

Firehawk Indy 500

Літні шини · Ультрависокопродуктивні

Тести – · поки немає Власники 87 · 1 454 відгуки

Найкращий результат: 6-е місце з 22 у 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 Tire Review After my stock rubber wore down I decided to look into other (cheaper) options for this summer. I landed on getting a set of Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 205/40/17 tires and have been on them for about a week now in both rain and dry. The TLDR of this would be buy these tires! The longer version of it is that these tires to me at least feel much more comfortable than the stock tires both in terms of ride comfort and road noise. On top of that the grip in the wet is impressive to say the least! I got a lot of rain here in Oregon so wet performance was really important to me. On the stock tires I always left my TC on and was careful going around turns especially as the tires wore down further and further. These Indy 500 just keep on gripping in the wet and I haven't had any problems at all. The first day I had them out in the dry I would have sworn my car was actually faster accelerating! Probably because there was less wheel hopping or it simply just grabbed the road better. I haven't tried a launch on them yet but hope to do some auto-crossing and such in the Spring. If you have any questions about these things fire away. Read more”

Шина BFalken

Azenis FK510

Літні шини · Ультрависокопродуктивні

Тести 72 · 29 тестів Власники 82 · 478 відгуків

Найкращий результат: 5-е місце з 10 у 2018 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test (загальне місце)

“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”

Категорія за категорією

Relative Score за категоріями, 0–100. «Чому така оцінка» показує тести й оцінки власників.

  1. 93

    Сухе покриття

    Firehawk Indy 500 +13
    80
    Чому така оцінка
    ДжерелоFirehawk Indy 500Azenis FK510
    Професійні тести (оцінка TWG)–74
    Власники (Tire Rack)9389
    Власники (Tyre Reviews)8488
    Власники (SimpleTire)9697
  2. 84

    Мокре покриття

    Azenis FK510 +1
    85
    Чому така оцінка
    ДжерелоFirehawk Indy 500Azenis FK510
    Професійні тести (оцінка TWG)–83
    Власники (Tire Rack)8486
    Власники (Tyre Reviews)6988
    Власники (SimpleTire)8591
  3. 63

    Сніг

    Azenis FK510 +12
    75
    Чому така оцінка
    ДжерелоFirehawk Indy 500Azenis FK510
    Власники (SimpleTire)6375
  4. 85

    Комфорт

    Firehawk Indy 500 +24
    61
    Чому така оцінка
    ДжерелоFirehawk Indy 500Azenis FK510
    Професійні тести (оцінка TWG)–48
    Власники (Tire Rack)8583
    Власники (Tyre Reviews)7577
    Власники (SimpleTire)9195
  5. 87

    Шум

    Firehawk Indy 500 +16
    71
    Чому така оцінка
    ДжерелоFirehawk Indy 500Azenis FK510
    Професійні тести (оцінка TWG)–60
    Власники (SimpleTire)8788
  6. 81

    Зносостійкість

    Firehawk Indy 500 +6
    75
    Чому така оцінка
    ДжерелоFirehawk Indy 500Azenis FK510
    Власники (Tire Rack)8177
    Власники (Tyre Reviews)6571
    Власники (SimpleTire)8680
  7. 83

    Керованість

    Firehawk Indy 500 +2
    81
    Чому така оцінка
    ДжерелоFirehawk Indy 500Azenis FK510
    Власники (Tyre Reviews)8381
    Власники (DriverReviews)–86
Оцінки коротко
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 vs Falken Azenis FK510: оцінки за категоріями (0–100)
КатегоріяFirestone Firehawk Indy 500Falken Azenis FK510
Відносна оцінка 82 76
Сухе покриття 93 80
Мокре покриття 84 85
Сніг 63 75
Комфорт 85 61
Шум 87 71
Зносостійкість 81 75
Керованість 83 81

Більше — краще. Відносна оцінка залежить від ваших пріоритетів нижче; оцінки категорій не змінюються.

Визначте, які категорії важливі саме вам

Зчеплення на мокрому та зносостійкість за замовчуванням «Важливо» — саме їх покупці цінують найбільше. Рухайте повзунки — оцінки оновлюються миттєво.

Нейтрально
НіМеншеНейтральноБільшеМакс
Важливо
НіМеншеНейтральноБільшеМакс
Нейтрально
НіМеншеНейтральноБільшеМакс
Нейтрально
НіМеншеНейтральноБільшеМакс
Нейтрально
НіМеншеНейтральноБільшеМакс
Важливо
НіМеншеНейтральноБільшеМакс
Нейтрально
НіМеншеНейтральноБільшеМакс
Перераховано
Загальна оцінка

Firehawk Indy 500

Azenis FK510

Професійні результати тестів, на яких базуються оцінки

Кожен результат показано у % від найкращої шини в цьому тесті. Рядки «Той самий тест» — найточніше порівняння: обидві шини вимірювали разом.

ДисциплінаКатегоріяFirehawk Indy 500Azenis FK510ΔОбидві?
Tested Tread Life (Miles) Інші 62% #6/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires 54% #17/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires +7,7 Той самий тест
Загальне місце Загалом 62% #9/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires 20% #5/10 · 2018 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test +41,9 Різні тести

Плюси, мінуси та спостереження

Теми з відгуків власників на сайтах магазинів та оглядів — це не думка TireWheelGuide.

Шина A Firehawk Indy 500

Плюси

  • Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium tier brands like Michelin
  • Outstanding dry grip and confident, responsive cornering capabilities
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality on the highway

Мінуси

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Poor performance and loss of traction in cold temperatures (below 40°F)
  • Vulnerability to hydroplaning or reduced traction in heavy standing water
Усі теми власників в огляді Firehawk Indy 500

Шина B Azenis FK510

Плюси

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Мінуси

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
Усі теми власників в огляді Azenis FK510

Що кажуть реальні власники

З Reddit, форумів та обговорень. Не враховується в оцінці

Шина A

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Позитивні

Community opinion on the Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is largely positive, praising it as an affordable, high-performing summer tire with great dry grip, impressive wet performance for its price class, and good ride comfort. While some enthusiasts note a slightly softer sidewall response compared to more expensive tier-one options like Michelins, the overwhelming consensus highlights its exceptional value.

r/MINI ·20 голосів ·2025-05-02

“Firehawk Indy 500s As promised, some initial thoughts. These are extremely comfortable. They honestly made it hard to understand how fast I was going because I've come to gauge my speed based on how much I'm being jostled around. I felt almost nothing with these, and there's so much construction on my way to work from the tire place, including a road that hasn't been surfaced properly yet. Perfect testing run for comfort. In terms of performance these bite the road a lot better and it's a lot easier for me to get moving again. Granted, my run flats were almost bald and that's my most recent memory of how they performed, but it's shocking how much I can take a turn or even just accelerate without any risk of sliding or slipping. It feels like a completely different car honestly, and people aren't kidding when they say "just get better tires" on some of these posts asking about mods. It's not as sexy as a new intake, but it makes a much bigger difference. I mean I feel like I was missing out on at least half of my roadster's potential here. So yeah I definitely like them. I don't mean to insult the tire guys' ability to apply tire shine, but I need to redo that disaster when I'm home. I only have detailing spray right now.”

r/Mustang ·7 голосів ·2025-02-13

“Will I regret buying Firestone Firehawk Indy 500s? I have a stock '21 GT Premium convertible with the black appearance package. It came with the upgraded Pirelli P Zero 255/40-19 tires, but with 35,000 miles, they are really worn, and I need new tires. I live in North Florida. We don't have a lot of cold weather (I missed the snow last month), but I do get a lot of rain. I don't track the car, and mostly drive on country roads and the interstate. The Pirelli's have treated me well as far as traction, dry and wet. I like the aggressive look of the Firehawks, but I am concerned about wet weather traction. Will the Firehawks be at least comparable to the Pirelli's for wet weather and general handling? If not, it sounds like the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 is the way to go. Also, the car is all black, with black rims, and the tires look wimpy. I'm not up for new rims this go-round, and I won't lower it because I like the clearance for potholes, etc., that I see a lot of in my area. I'm hoping the tires will help the look a little bit. Read more”

r/S2000 ·4 голоси ·2025-06-04

“Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 reviews Hi all! First post here on Reddit for S2K. I have a 2002 with 80k (130 km's) that is 100% stock. I recently purchased some new tires moving from a Potenza RE-71 (rear) Potenza RE760 (front) I bought the Indy 500 Firehawk since a lot of S2K owners say they are an excellent tire, perfect for the S2K with a ton of great qualities. So far I am thinking a little bit of a mixxed bag. The tires are not as responsive as I thought and don't inspire the same level of cornering confidence. The seem a little mushy/soft and my rear end thus far doesn't seem as firmly planted as I would like. Almost kind of wobbly? Alignment is fine, tires are brand new with less than 100 miles on them and tire pressure is factory spec within 1 psi. The DOT code for the tires is late 2024 so brand new. I don't track the car and these days just baby it around town mostly so the tires use should fine for my use. Thanks! Leer más”

Головні теми
#Value and Pricing#Dry and Wet Grip#Ride Comfort and Noise#Sidewall Response and Feel#Comparison to Premium Brands

На основі 27 дописів спільноти

Шина B

Falken Azenis FK510

Змішані

Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.

r/TeslaModelS ·3 голоси ·2025-11-25

“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”

r/kereta ·3 голоси ·2024-05-12

“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”

r/TeslaModel3 ·1 голос ·2024-02-10

“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”

Головні теми
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance

На основі 25 дописів спільноти

Характеристики поруч

Параметр A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 B · Falken Azenis FK510
КатегоріяЛітні шини · УльтрависокопродуктивніЛітні шини · Ультрависокопродуктивні
Тип автоPassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Доступні розміри4768
Діаметри дисків16″ – 20″17″ – 22″
Глибина протектора9 - 10/32″7,9 mm (10/32″)
UTQG340 A A300 A A
БоковинаBlack Side WallBlackwall
Макс. тиск50 - 51 psi3,4 bar (50 psi)

Яку ж купити?

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Falken Azenis FK510

Переможець: Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — краща за показниками: комфорт, шум і сухе покриття. Обирайте Falken Azenis FK510, якщо для вас найважливіше: сніг.

Обирайте шину A Вам потрібна максимальна комфортність

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 має 85 проти 61 у категорії «комфорт».

Обирайте шину A Вам потрібен тихіший салон

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 має 87 проти 71 у категорії «шум».

Обирайте шину A Вам потрібне максимальне зчеплення на сухій дорозі

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 має 93 проти 80 у категорії «сухе покриття».

Обирайте шину B Ви їздите сніжними зимами

Falken Azenis FK510 має 75 проти 63 у категорії «сніг».

Шина A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Шина B · Falken Azenis FK510

TireWheelGuide може отримувати комісію за покупки за цими посиланнями.

Як ми порівнюємо шини?

Оцінка кожної категорії поєднує два незалежні джерела. 60% — професійні тести шин (гальмівний шлях, час кола, вимірювання шуму), нормовані відносно найкращої шини в кожному тесті з більшою вагою новіших тестів. 40% — тисячі відгуків власників із сайтів магазинів і оглядів. Якщо для шини є лише одне з джерел, ми використовуємо його і про це повідомляємо.

Думки спільноти з Reddit і форумів наведено лише для контексту — вони не впливають на оцінку.

82

Попереду

Firehawk Indy 500

Amazon